A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a firm director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations, an image which includes due to the fact become emblematic on the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible proof of your wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the water during intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected in detail through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any predicament that lots of observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier famous which the businessman had Formerly been associated with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted Paul Feely and René Collier how men and women from pretty various Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are becoming synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.